sidbee
03-11 11:04 AM
Folks,
Please read this. if USCIS takes this seriously then we can expect some movement in coming visa Bulletins
Cyrus D. Mehta & Associates, PLLC (http://cyrusmehta.com/news.aspx?SubIdx=ocyrus20103925436)
U think USCIS doesn't know this ??? Creating this thread ,with the given title is just a waste of everyone's time,
Please read this. if USCIS takes this seriously then we can expect some movement in coming visa Bulletins
Cyrus D. Mehta & Associates, PLLC (http://cyrusmehta.com/news.aspx?SubIdx=ocyrus20103925436)
U think USCIS doesn't know this ??? Creating this thread ,with the given title is just a waste of everyone's time,
wallpaper with Ranbir Kapoor public.
sprash
01-14 05:06 PM
Thanks.
In my case I work for startup and I'm the only one who they are sponsoring for GC (rest all are either US citizens, GC holders or contractors) and my I140 is already approved, so ability to pay is not a concern with my company.
While I have a good rapport with the CEO etc, I am nervous that they might revoke I-140 in case they have lay offs that affect me. I was looking for some articles or USCIS documents that say that there is no requirement to revoke I-140.
Its just harder to prove that there are no such requirements other than saying "look, you couldn't find anything that says you should revoke I-140, therefore don't do it". It would be more convincing if I find something more explicit that says there is no such requirement.
In my case I work for startup and I'm the only one who they are sponsoring for GC (rest all are either US citizens, GC holders or contractors) and my I140 is already approved, so ability to pay is not a concern with my company.
While I have a good rapport with the CEO etc, I am nervous that they might revoke I-140 in case they have lay offs that affect me. I was looking for some articles or USCIS documents that say that there is no requirement to revoke I-140.
Its just harder to prove that there are no such requirements other than saying "look, you couldn't find anything that says you should revoke I-140, therefore don't do it". It would be more convincing if I find something more explicit that says there is no such requirement.
manand24
10-08 02:34 PM
Still waiting.
--------------------------
PD 04/2006 EB2 INDIA
I-140 NSC AP 10/2006
SELF:
I-485 NSC RD 07/02/07; ND 09/10/2007; RD 09/17/2007 from NSC; LUD 10/07/2007
I-131 (Travel Document) NSC RD 07/02/07; ND 09/10/2007; RD 09/17/2007 from NSC
I-765 (EAD) NSC RD 07/02/07; ND 09/10/2007; Card received on 10/03/2007
BioMetrics given on 10/05/2007
WIFE
I-485 NSC RD 07/02/07; ND 09/10/2007; RD 09/17/2007 from NSC; ; LUD 10/07/2007
I-131 (Travel Document) NSC RD 07/02/07; ND 09/10/2007;RD 09/18/2007 from NSC
I-765 (EAD) NSC RD 07/02/07; ND 09/10/2007; Card received on 10/03/2007
BioMetrics given on 10/05/2007
--------------------------
--------------------------
PD 04/2006 EB2 INDIA
I-140 NSC AP 10/2006
SELF:
I-485 NSC RD 07/02/07; ND 09/10/2007; RD 09/17/2007 from NSC; LUD 10/07/2007
I-131 (Travel Document) NSC RD 07/02/07; ND 09/10/2007; RD 09/17/2007 from NSC
I-765 (EAD) NSC RD 07/02/07; ND 09/10/2007; Card received on 10/03/2007
BioMetrics given on 10/05/2007
WIFE
I-485 NSC RD 07/02/07; ND 09/10/2007; RD 09/17/2007 from NSC; ; LUD 10/07/2007
I-131 (Travel Document) NSC RD 07/02/07; ND 09/10/2007;RD 09/18/2007 from NSC
I-765 (EAD) NSC RD 07/02/07; ND 09/10/2007; Card received on 10/03/2007
BioMetrics given on 10/05/2007
--------------------------
2011 his bets on Ranbir Kapoor
venram
02-10 01:49 AM
My passport is expiring in March. I live in NY metro . Does anyone knows the procedure to renew the passport while in the USA. Please share your experience.
Its very easy and simple. Go to NY Indian Embassy web site and follow the procedure/process to renew passport. It takes about 1-2 weeks, after you mail the old passport along with other documents, for Indian Embassy to process and mail you back the new passport. Good Luck!
Its very easy and simple. Go to NY Indian Embassy web site and follow the procedure/process to renew passport. It takes about 1-2 weeks, after you mail the old passport along with other documents, for Indian Embassy to process and mail you back the new passport. Good Luck!
more...
DSLStart
06-26 10:45 AM
I guess it must be Nebraska, as my 131 was approved by TSC about a month ago and the status is still case pending...
Is it at Texas or Nebraska?
Is it at Texas or Nebraska?
snathan
10-14 12:38 AM
My company filed an I-140 in December 2009. The petition (an EB2) was APPROVED in May 2010. A month or so later, I was laid off but BEFORE the I-485 was ever filed. As far as I know, the I-140 has not been revoked. What are my potential options here? Can I find a new employer to file a 485 provided the new job is similar to the I-140 petition or do they have to start the whole process again?
No...need to start the GC from scratch. You can not use your I140 as you no longer employed by the GC sponsor and can not use AC21 as I-485 was not filed.
No...need to start the GC from scratch. You can not use your I140 as you no longer employed by the GC sponsor and can not use AC21 as I-485 was not filed.
more...
gc28262
03-15 11:26 PM
Please see the link.
http://immigrationvoice.org/forum/blog.php?b=39
The new job has to be same or similar irrespective of whether you transfer on EAD or H1.
http://immigrationvoice.org/forum/blog.php?b=39
The new job has to be same or similar irrespective of whether you transfer on EAD or H1.
2010 Ranbir Kapoor Wallpapers
deecha
03-17 08:53 PM
As long as you're unmarried at the time of adjudication of the petition, you should be ok. This is not legal advice. Please consult a lawyer.
HI,
My aunt petioned for my mom (and thus her kids) years ago, My aunt's a Us citizen, and after many years the process has started its final run. For the last two years i was an F1 student in a college in the usa and recently ive come back home; while i was there i married randomly anyway, nothing happened it wasnt a real marriage, and im getting it annuled.
So now im back home and since this process (my aunts petition) has started , im 21 but im covered aswell since the child status protection act covers me. Now, the requirements for the children (derivative beneficiaries) of the aplicant/beneficiary (my mom) to be included are to be under.. 21 (im ok in this part because of CSPA) and UNMARRIED. My question is,,, am i still gonna be included if i show my annulment certificate? as i see it the annulment itself shows that an american court declared that marriage to be voidable and not real so it should make me unmarried.right? would it also be unmarried for immigration purposes if it was divorce instead of annulment? i'd appreciate any feedback, thank you.
.
HI,
My aunt petioned for my mom (and thus her kids) years ago, My aunt's a Us citizen, and after many years the process has started its final run. For the last two years i was an F1 student in a college in the usa and recently ive come back home; while i was there i married randomly anyway, nothing happened it wasnt a real marriage, and im getting it annuled.
So now im back home and since this process (my aunts petition) has started , im 21 but im covered aswell since the child status protection act covers me. Now, the requirements for the children (derivative beneficiaries) of the aplicant/beneficiary (my mom) to be included are to be under.. 21 (im ok in this part because of CSPA) and UNMARRIED. My question is,,, am i still gonna be included if i show my annulment certificate? as i see it the annulment itself shows that an american court declared that marriage to be voidable and not real so it should make me unmarried.right? would it also be unmarried for immigration purposes if it was divorce instead of annulment? i'd appreciate any feedback, thank you.
.
more...
golmalreturn
01-14 11:46 AM
Hello,
I am Dec 02/EB3/India candidate. Currently using EAD/AP to work. No H1b visa.
My current project � SAP PI implementation requires me to travel to London / Ontario, Canada, on a weekly basis. This is going to be for few months at least. Employer is in US, major work place will be US, still working with original employer who filed GC; even residence is in US.
Has anyone travel more than once on AP?
Is that ok or there are risk factors?
Has anyone traveled on AP using car by road? How is experience compared to enter via airport?
Any help will be highly appreciated.
Thanks.
I am Dec 02/EB3/India candidate. Currently using EAD/AP to work. No H1b visa.
My current project � SAP PI implementation requires me to travel to London / Ontario, Canada, on a weekly basis. This is going to be for few months at least. Employer is in US, major work place will be US, still working with original employer who filed GC; even residence is in US.
Has anyone travel more than once on AP?
Is that ok or there are risk factors?
Has anyone traveled on AP using car by road? How is experience compared to enter via airport?
Any help will be highly appreciated.
Thanks.
hair Ranbir Kapoor
.jpg "Kaif with Ranbir Kapoor,")
ruchigup
08-18 11:02 PM
This information is helpful. Thanks
more...
CHHAYA
04-26 01:01 PM
I am working on EAD and want to work 20 hrs. What is the risk involved in I-485 processing? Thanks in advance for any light.
hot Ranbir Kapoor
cygent
06-18 08:03 PM
Dear Attorney,
I request your help with the following.
I am working for Client A on EAD through Vendor B & Company C (my W2 holder) in California. I now want to join Vendor B & work for Client A. What are the ramifications based on below?
This is my agreement with C :-
During the term of the assignment & for a period of 1 Year following the termination of the business/employment relationship between C & cygent, cygent will not do any of the following:
1. Directly or indirectly call on, solicit, or take away (directly or through another entity) any of C's customers or potential customers cygent became aware of as a result of performing services for the above referenced assignment; or
2. Directly or indirectly offer or attempt to offer (directly or through another entity) services that were offered via C for the same projects that were performed under the agreements between C & cygent, or
3. solicit or hire away any of C's employees or contractors C became aware of as a result of performing services under agreements between cygent & C.
cygent will be held responsible for any losses suffered by C due to violation of the terms stated in this agreement. jurisdiction is County of Alameda, California.
Thank you & Regards,
CYGENT
I request your help with the following.
I am working for Client A on EAD through Vendor B & Company C (my W2 holder) in California. I now want to join Vendor B & work for Client A. What are the ramifications based on below?
This is my agreement with C :-
During the term of the assignment & for a period of 1 Year following the termination of the business/employment relationship between C & cygent, cygent will not do any of the following:
1. Directly or indirectly call on, solicit, or take away (directly or through another entity) any of C's customers or potential customers cygent became aware of as a result of performing services for the above referenced assignment; or
2. Directly or indirectly offer or attempt to offer (directly or through another entity) services that were offered via C for the same projects that were performed under the agreements between C & cygent, or
3. solicit or hire away any of C's employees or contractors C became aware of as a result of performing services under agreements between cygent & C.
cygent will be held responsible for any losses suffered by C due to violation of the terms stated in this agreement. jurisdiction is County of Alameda, California.
Thank you & Regards,
CYGENT
more...
house boy Ranbir Kapoor.
485user
11-19 10:14 AM
Hi,
I need small help, how did you re-file? do you have checklist or procedure kind of stuff. So that i will talk to new lawyer with all these info.
Please reply back.
Thanks
your friend
I need small help, how did you re-file? do you have checklist or procedure kind of stuff. So that i will talk to new lawyer with all these info.
Please reply back.
Thanks
your friend
tattoo Ranbir Kapoor and Shah Rukh
BMS1
11-04 01:15 AM
That was an old news. Around 60000 visa's were pre-allocated to pending applications before July 2nd, 2007. I would be very surprised if the numbers are not much more than 18000 for India EB3. India used to get around 40-45 K visas per year for all EB categories before 2005 since the soft quota was introduced. All these numbers are avilable on USCIS website.
more...
pictures Ranbir Kapoor at Ajab Prem Ki
anilsal
01-11 11:42 AM
do not worry about the middle name.
dresses ae haseeno,ranbir kapoor
fasterthanlight�
05-09 10:29 PM
Mucho better-o
more...
makeup Ranbir Kapoor is flying high
sevenm
03-02 02:24 PM
Hi everyone,
Does anyone have experience with expedited H1-B filing? The one that you are supposed to receive the answer in 15 days. I am just wondering if it really works and if it is possible to hurt your petition by filing expedited?
Thanks a lot in advance.
Does anyone have experience with expedited H1-B filing? The one that you are supposed to receive the answer in 15 days. I am just wondering if it really works and if it is possible to hurt your petition by filing expedited?
Thanks a lot in advance.
girlfriend Ranbir Kapoor Sonam Kapoor
WeldonSprings
08-25 05:27 PM
1-800-375-5283
Press 1 to select English
Press 2 for a Case
Enetr 1 for receipt no.
Midaway press 3 and then 4.
USCIS probably realized that many of us were calling and tried to give some relief to our tired fingers, instead of giving us the GC!
Hi all
I have been trying to use the POJ method to reach an IO but looks like USCIS has shutdown that option. After entering the receipt number it simply reads out the online status message and does not provide any option to reach a CSR.
Looks like eccessive status calls have caused this.
Has anyone still been able to use the POJ method today and if yes can u pls post the details ??
Thanks
Press 1 to select English
Press 2 for a Case
Enetr 1 for receipt no.
Midaway press 3 and then 4.
USCIS probably realized that many of us were calling and tried to give some relief to our tired fingers, instead of giving us the GC!
Hi all
I have been trying to use the POJ method to reach an IO but looks like USCIS has shutdown that option. After entering the receipt number it simply reads out the online status message and does not provide any option to reach a CSR.
Looks like eccessive status calls have caused this.
Has anyone still been able to use the POJ method today and if yes can u pls post the details ??
Thanks
hairstyles Ranbir Kapoor is relatively a
Blog Feeds
09-24 03:20 AM
Federal Reserve Chairman Ben Bernanke said that on September 15, 2009, the worst recession since the 1930s is probably over, although he cautioned that pain - especially for the nearly 15 million unemployed Americans - will persist. Bernanke said the economy likely is growing now, but he warned that won't be sufficient to prevent the unemployment rate, now at a 26-year high of 9.7 percent, from rising. The recession, which started in December 2007, has claimed a net total of 6.9 million jobs.
With expectations for a lethargic recovery, the Fed predicts that unemployment will top 10 percent this year. The post-World War II high was 10.8 percent at the end of 1982. Some economists say it will take at least four years for the jobless rate to drop down to a more normal range of 5 percent.
Analysts predict the U.S. economy is growing in the current quarter, which ends Sept. 30, at an annual rate of 3 to 4 percent. It shrank at a 1 percent pace in the second quarter, much slower than in previous quarters. While many on Wall Street have been encouraged by early signs of stabilization in U.S. home prices and hope the housing market may have hit bottom, others aren't so sure.
Still, Bernanke's declaration that the recession likely ended marked his most optimistic assessment yet of the economy. And his remarks came on the same day that the government report that retail sales jumped 2.7 percent in August, the most in more than three years. All this helped to lift stocks on Wall Street. The Dow Jones industrial averaged gained nearly 57 points to 9,683.41, its highest finish since Oct. 6. He said that the economy is coping with "ongoing headwinds," including hard-to-get-credit for consumers and businesses, and households saving more, spending less and trimming their debt. Those forces can weigh down the recovery, he said.
More... (http://www.visalawyerblog.com/2009/09/us_economy_is_reviving_slowly.html)
With expectations for a lethargic recovery, the Fed predicts that unemployment will top 10 percent this year. The post-World War II high was 10.8 percent at the end of 1982. Some economists say it will take at least four years for the jobless rate to drop down to a more normal range of 5 percent.
Analysts predict the U.S. economy is growing in the current quarter, which ends Sept. 30, at an annual rate of 3 to 4 percent. It shrank at a 1 percent pace in the second quarter, much slower than in previous quarters. While many on Wall Street have been encouraged by early signs of stabilization in U.S. home prices and hope the housing market may have hit bottom, others aren't so sure.
Still, Bernanke's declaration that the recession likely ended marked his most optimistic assessment yet of the economy. And his remarks came on the same day that the government report that retail sales jumped 2.7 percent in August, the most in more than three years. All this helped to lift stocks on Wall Street. The Dow Jones industrial averaged gained nearly 57 points to 9,683.41, its highest finish since Oct. 6. He said that the economy is coping with "ongoing headwinds," including hard-to-get-credit for consumers and businesses, and households saving more, spending less and trimming their debt. Those forces can weigh down the recovery, he said.
More... (http://www.visalawyerblog.com/2009/09/us_economy_is_reviving_slowly.html)
guyfromsg
07-18 11:59 PM
What is the best possible solution to get around different place birth on Passport and BC. Any has affidavit format for such issue please share it.
According to chat transcript from a lawyer's site some one had the same question. The answer is "USCIS does not care much about secondary document like passport and what's in the primary document like Birth certificate is important and matters". In other words they may not be comparing the passport and birth certificate for place of birth. Just my 2cents as I'm not a lawyer.
Hope this helps.
According to chat transcript from a lawyer's site some one had the same question. The answer is "USCIS does not care much about secondary document like passport and what's in the primary document like Birth certificate is important and matters". In other words they may not be comparing the passport and birth certificate for place of birth. Just my 2cents as I'm not a lawyer.
Hope this helps.
seemashah
02-21 05:29 PM
usually a CPA can give an audited report ...or the bank auditors can
Is the company a Corp, LLC or sole prop?
>>The company is a Corporation. Can any CPA give an audit report... can you be more elaborative about the process of getting audited report... like what are we supposed to provide the CPA to get the audit report...
Is the company a Corp, LLC or sole prop?
>>The company is a Corporation. Can any CPA give an audit report... can you be more elaborative about the process of getting audited report... like what are we supposed to provide the CPA to get the audit report...
No comments:
Post a Comment